Shame On SUN TV & Media To Release Nithyananda Scandal Video

by admin on March 2, 2010

I have just came across the news in my most pervert news channel in my regional language Tamil, I must say its really shame on their part to release this really useless news to public and I feel totally bad about the public’s reaction on the whole subject.

Here is my stand point on the whole issue:

1. What is wrong in Nithyananda having sex with a girl? Who are we as a public or as an individual to judge that its wrong for a person like Nithyananda to have sex?

2. Who said Gods don’t have sex?
May jesus did not had sex, but all Hindu gods had sex, even Kamasutra which was written by Vatsyayana is a sannyasin. People’s idea that God’s don’t have sex came from christianity so if you think people like Nithyananda don’t have sex then its not something that is wrong on his part, its primarily wrong on your part, if you are an Hindu you are being brainwashed by Christian ideas that Gods don’t have sex. May be if these people like SUN TV can try to keep spy cams on other people’s bedroom and open a big scandal videos channel to the public.

3. Nithyananda And His Foundation Should Sue SUN TV:

Who gave rights to SUN TV to place spy cams on whats happening in someone else’s bed room and telecast it to public? its the most shameful act that can be done by most respected TV channel in south India.

I am not a disciple of Nithyananda personally but being a third person I feel shame on my people and the type of media which people are exposed to in my place.

I think Nithyananda should come forward and take this case to court and sue SUN TV for telecasting this video to public!

I want to make it more clear for people who think that I am supporting Nithyananda which is NOT TRUE!

I am against MEDIA FOR TELECASTING SUCH VIDEOS!! Which is illegal! Also please don’t post lame comments that Nithyananda having sex is wrong! He has every right to have sex, even if he had told himself to be a celibate, whose permission he need to break his celibacy? don’t just pass your own pervert judgment on a person that just because he had sex with a girl he is a wrong Guru… He is far more better than our Tamil Nadu government selling alcohol to its citizens..

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Is The Guy In The Scandal Video Is Real Nithyananda? – Is Nithyananda Video Faked
  2. Swami Nithyananda Moves To Court To Restrain Media From Scandal Video
  3. Nithyananda’s Response To His Scandal Video And Message To His Followers
  4. Swami Nithyananda Responds To Media Hype On His Issue
  5. What Is The Use In Worshiping Images And Idols

{ 4 trackbacks }

Shame On SUN TV & Media To Release Nithyananda Scandal Video
March 2, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Shame On SUN TV & Media To Release Nithyananda Scandal Video
March 2, 2010 at 8:03 pm
Shame On SUN TV & Media To Release Nithyananda Scandal Video
March 2, 2010 at 9:15 pm
Shame On SUN TV & Media To Release Nithyananda Scandal Video | Drakz Free Online Service
March 2, 2010 at 10:24 pm

{ 180 comments }

1 admin March 13, 2010 at 8:27 am

@amit
Who said safron clothed are supposed to be celibate? Also he has not raped the actress lol.. get your facts straight..

2 Gary March 13, 2010 at 6:39 pm

Admin

your morals are way out of whack dude

3 Naveen Nair March 13, 2010 at 6:40 pm

@ Admin: I resign..
Nithyananda is great.
Osho is great.
And u are great.

4 admin March 13, 2010 at 10:05 pm

@Naveen

Thank you! lol

@Gary

I don’t have any morals.. hehe..

5 gary March 14, 2010 at 2:21 am

you may or may not have morals but you are the type who is holding india back in the dark ages.

free my india. fuck gurus and religion.

6 admin March 14, 2010 at 7:16 am

@gary

hehe.. I am not holding back anybody.. :) and people who are holding India back to dark ages are people who claim themselves to be scientific and run away from our culture and way of life.. lol.. frankly Hinduism is not a religion its just the way Indians lived.. its only when British invaded India it was forced to become a religion..

Try to read vedas, shiva purana and other Hindu scriptures.. we were not in old dark ages and we were more scientific and prosperous society.. I can agree with people who have really read Hindu scriptures and say its rubbish.. and in fact there are none and people who claim to be Hindus today knows nothing about it, and simply argue a person who wears saffron should not have sex, which makes no sense. Hinduism or the way Indians lived in the past had no such rules.. we created our own rules and call it Hinduism.. Hinduism had no rules, it only put forth the laws of nature. It just tells that if you keep your finger over the fire it hurts and it doesn’t forbid a person from keeping his finger over it..

I will always support a person who has read our scriptures and who has made an attempt to spread it among people. I will respect that guy because he has the knowledge and I am against media and politicians because they are trying to prevent that knowledge from reaching to people.

I will say one thing to anyone who is against Nithyananda..

Nithyananda has put forth some methods and his methods are the only epicenter of his teachings, unless a person has tried those methods, he has no right to talk ill about him.. and unless a person has read about Hinduism and knows what it says clearly he has no authority to say this is Hinduism.. and No media channel has any rights to say ill about my religion and make a debate on NDTV with the woman in bob-cut as a judge who has no knowledge about Hinduism to comment about it, she has no authority to talk about it.. nor does any politicians..

7 Rama March 15, 2010 at 3:30 am

I came across the forum, felt much interesting.

I have read much about veda, I do know what I am what spirituality is.

No one can avoid sex, all spirituality is about acceptance. No spiritual guru is against sex, all they said is love and sex are divine. People are more interested in separation, we hear what we want too.

If you leave bible, Jesus is a great person. he loved people, he has girl friend. What you say about Hinduism is very much true. All south Indian temple are tantric temple, we are still trying to run way with the as Art of sculpture.

Media needs TRP, you cant do anything for it. Some where it good, its bringing some truth.

My personal experience in last one year in London, people wants tomany answer, hardly one is opened accept truth, all they want to hear is what they want to.

No one is ready to accept when you tell spirituality is as simple as this. Then there is a long discourse is needed, they feel comfortable when someone says a lot of rule, and referrence from noble books.

I was trying to see few of his teaching in youtube, I felt rediculous when I say Nithyananda experience on Enlightment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QPbNMUnsvw

Many may not believe in this, I am not enlightent. Let me not bring a discourse here.

All is Well, it happened for good. The seeker is always going to seek, there are real spiritual guru too.

8 naren March 15, 2010 at 4:11 am

i second gary in all his opinions.

i think the admin is a madman!just another lame freak!get over this bullshit and wake up man…one year from now that frickin moron will be locked up in jail!i cant believe people can be so dumb to believe these ‘godmen’ even after all this bullshit..that so-called swamis latest interviews show what a big liar he is..trying to be all evasive, diplomatic and cautious in his answers and stuttering now and then!im sorry Mr.Swamiji you are going to HELL haha

9 admin March 15, 2010 at 4:34 am

@Naren

Haha don’t make me laugh!!

10 naren March 15, 2010 at 4:44 am

you are out of your senses and no one is ready to listen to your shit..so laugh at yourself!

11 admin March 15, 2010 at 4:50 am

@Naren
No one needs to listen to my shit.. hehe.. if you are listening then its your choice.. I never forced anyone to read this blog.

12 naren March 15, 2010 at 5:02 am

i din say u forced me to read this blog..i got ‘enlightened’ after reading this blog lol that fools still exist who believe godmen! maybe ur brother was a great follower of this nithyanandha and now that the cat is out of the bag prolly he still believes he is a good man and crap!get over this shit man!u know ..one thing i found out is that ur arguments were always pointless in ur previous comments and u beat around the bush just like MR.nithyanandha lmao… my friend you say that ur individual opinion is that even if he had sex with the actress its not wrong!common man u are just trying to prove that what yu are bullshitting is right!i would say if he was a normal guy there was nothing wrong if he had slept with some girl!this bloody freak portrays himself as a swamiji, a bramachary and bull shit and does all this non sense and u still think he is not wrong!that is sheer stupidity! if he wanted to have a normal life then why take up sannyasa and become a swamiji bla bla?bottomline-the fraud needs to be hanged!ur stupid arguments would never cease!

13 admin March 15, 2010 at 5:56 am

@Naren
Everyone has got their own freedom to believe who ever they want and no one has any rights to attack individual belief system and freedom of choice and say this is wrong and this is right. If you think he is a crap then its fine keep it with you, you got no rights to hurt others and say they are wrong and you are right.. that’s my whole point. Everyone has got their own freedom of choice to choose whatever they want. They don’t have to listen to you or to me. Also my brother has got his own freedom of choice you don’t have to provide him with your views he never asked for it.

Also people who don’t know and has complete knowledge about this brahmacharya and bull shit has no authority to comment about it.

14 naren March 15, 2010 at 6:44 am

haha when u have a freedom of choice or whatever ..so do i!in my opinion MR.nithyananandha is a dirty cheap and a fraud!and its my wish to comment on that dirty arsehole and u don have to tell me what to do mister

15 admin March 15, 2010 at 8:02 am

@Naren
Blah blah!! I am just saying don’t get in to my space or anyone else’s personal space you are free to do whatever without doing that.. mister..

What has been done to Nithyananda was not right because media or who ever it is has breached in to his personal space and no one has got any rights to talk about it and say that is wrong or right because it belongs to him. Make sense in what you say..

“u don have to tell me what to do mister”

AH! YES You got it right, same goes with Nithyananda! :)

16 naren March 15, 2010 at 12:25 pm

you shameless fool!a guys scam has been exposed and he has cheated 2 million people and still fools like you support him!because of people like you more nithyanandhas will be born and they would practice what they dont preach! you still dont get my point.if he was an ordinary guy then you can say its intrusion of privacy blah blah!but he is supposedly a swamiji and when he is caught red handed like this he should be sent to jail!i dont wish to argue with a stupid guy like you anymore

17 naren March 15, 2010 at 12:32 pm

* they would not practice what they preach

moreover he has hurt the religious sentiments of millions of people.moreover six criminal charges have been filed against him!so surely he is going to HELL!for your information
The six sections with which the Central Crime Branch registered cases are:

1) Section 420 – Cheating and indulging in fraudulent activities.

2) Section 506 – Punishment for intimidation (of the inmates such as Lenin Karuppan).

3) Section 376 – Punishment for Rape (where several of the women devotees are said to be raped by Swami Nithyananda. A Canadian Women was said to have been raped by Nithyananda! She later died and the cause for the death could not be determined).

4)Section 295 (A) – Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.

5) Section 377 – Sexual activity “against the order of nature” which was earlier involving of Homosexuality and was repealed on 2/7/2009. This section of the law involves punishment and criminalisation of coercive sex and sex with minors. Nithyananda was alleged to have involved in coercive sex and hence the law was enforced on him. He also had indulged in unnatural sex offences apparently complained by Lenin Karuppan.

6) Section 120 – Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment (Criminal Conspiracy)

surely he will be arrested on most of these charges.So bye-bye Mr.nithyanandha.lmao

18 Rama March 16, 2010 at 12:15 am

@Naren

Sex is a boon to humanity, swamji is not a exception.

No one can avoid sex, you can transcend.

19 Naveen Nair March 16, 2010 at 9:29 am

@ Naren: Don’t call Admin mad. That would be giving him undue importance. He is nothing but just another Nithyananda fan. (He will refute this. That is because, he has to put on the mask of neutrality to gain credibility.) For his first post, I had replied point by point, which he snubbed saying “you people come with your own agenda and ask my opinion.” Well, I never asked his opinion – I just refuted all of his arguments cogently. Again, at another instance I replied to him saying his understanding of Osho is not matured and is biased. In his long post he replied in a tone which suggested he is the only person who is eligible enough to comment on Osho. (I had seen such guys: initially, while reading him, at a point you get possessive about him.) At that point I had to quit the discussion, realizing it is pointless. You can wake someone up only if he is asleep. If someone acts to be asleep, you cannot wake him up. Osho would have been the happiest person on Nithyananda video, had he been alive. Because, Osho had spent considerable time and energy, talking about such hypocrites, such fake gurus – especially about those ones who repress their sexual desires and pose as gurus.

Gary is consistently questioning and denying Admin’s arguments logically. Again, Admin just ignore them. The fundamental questions are these: How can Nithyananda exhibit such dishonesty? How can he pose as a celibate and then explore sex? How can he do something which is very close to prostitution? How can he cheat a married man (that lady’s husband)? And how can he lie over and over again saying those videos are fake? (The morph theory is for those who are not initiated into digital world. We all know very well, how a morphed video will look like.) These are the questions Admin will never answer. And these are the questions which are asked again and again, and yet again, in many of the comments. Admin deliberately pays no attention to such questions, and beats around the bush. If you have watched Nithyananda’s recent explanations or interviews, you will find the same strategy. Ignoring the fundamental question, and then talking nonsense in a fashion in which you will get confused. Admin is adopting Nithyananda strategy, which makes me strongly believe that he is just a Nithyananda pawn. I’m damn sure that the above questions will not be attended ever, ever by Admin. He will talk so many other stuff, will talk about judgements, about Hindu puranas, vedas, but wont answer the above questions.

Now, in one of his posts, admin comments, “you simply argue a person who wears saffron should not have sex, which makes no sense”. It makes a lot of sense, my dear. Saffron is a colour which was chosen for saints, by saint Shankaracharya. Before Shankara, there were no such colour code for saints. The colour, is something that resembles a funeral pyre, and something which is set to remind the saint about the pyre, that is, to constantly remind him that he is a person who has renounced all the material pleasures. Read Shankara smruthi, Thathva Bodha and Athma Bodha. Hinduism, as understood today, i.e., as a religion, do not have set rules – I agree. But it should also be noted that each set of believes, which were once a part of Indian religious system, had its own very set of rules. (More on this: read Sarva Darshana Samgraha, by Madhvaacharya.)

And the comment, “Nithyananda has put forth some methods and his methods are the only epicenter of his teachings, unless a person has tried those methods, he has no right to talk ill about him”, sounds ridiculous. Nithyananda has proved himself as a dishonest, a liar and a fraudster. To reject his entire set of teachings, that is just more than enough. It is preposterous to suggest that, you should read Mein Kampf to form an opinion on Auschwitz and other holocausts by Hitler.

I sign off, knowing well that, none of the questions will be answered, and none of my arguments will be refuted cogently. If Nithyananda cannot answer the questions, Admin, doubly cannot.

20 admin March 17, 2010 at 5:13 am

Gary is consistently questioning and denying Admin’s arguments logically.

I have taken time to answer most of the questions put forth by many people here and that too which abides by your so called logic and if you cannot take it logically then its your choice.. I am not forcing you to agree with me.

He will refute this. That is because, he has to put on the mask of neutrality to gain credibility
I am not going to refute this.. I am not a follower of Nithyananda that’s for certain but being an outsider I really see a person’s personal space is breached. Who is anyone to say its right or wrong about what he does in his personal space? Nobody has got that rights. I am supporting Nithyananda as an individual who got all the rights to do whatever in his personal space. I don’t look for credibility.. I want people to prove what he has done is wrong with some sense.. which none did. People who followed him were not worried about the issue, people who were against him started to damage his ashram and people who were in the neutral spot started to react to the whole situation in a negative way.

At that point I had to quit the discussion, realizing it is pointless. You can wake someone up only if he is asleep. If someone acts to be asleep, you cannot wake him up

Nobody needs to wake me up nor I asked anyone to..

Osho would have been the happiest person on Nithyananda video, had he been alive. Because, Osho had spent considerable time and energy, talking about such hypocrites, such fake gurus – especially about those ones who repress their sexual desires and pose as gurus.

That would be interesting.. but I don’t know its just another assumption you know..you can say anything and project your ideas over a dead person.

How can Nithyananda exhibit such dishonesty? How can he pose as a celibate and then explore sex? How can he do something which is very close to prostitution? How can he cheat a married man (that lady’s husband)? And how can he lie over and over again saying those videos are fake? (The morph theory is for those who are not initiated into digital world. We all know very well, how a morphed video will look like.) These are the questions Admin will never answer.

I think you are not updating yourself with latest news.. video is still under investigation, also I don’t know where he had sex in the video. lol.. but my point is even if he did one who should be worried about it are the people who followed him and not others and secondly that’s his private space. We got no rights to comment on it.

“you simply argue a person who wears saffron should not have sex, which makes no sense”. It makes a lot of sense, my dear. Saffron is a colour which was chosen for saints, by saint Shankaracharya. Before Shankara, there were no such colour code for saints. The colour, is something that resembles a funeral pyre, and something which is set to remind the saint about the pyre, that is, to constantly remind him that he is a person who has renounced all the material pleasures. Read Shankara smruthi, Thathva Bodha and Athma Bodha. Hinduism, as understood today, i.e., as a religion, do not have set rules – I agree. But it should also be noted that each set of believes, which were once a part of Indian religious system, had its own very set of rules. (More on this: read Sarva Darshana Samgraha, by Madhvaacharya.)

Again video has not proved he had sex.. plus no rules whatever on a person who wears safron should not have sex..

“Nithyananda has put forth some methods and his methods are the only epicenter of his teachings, unless a person has tried those methods, he has no right to talk ill about him”, sounds ridiculous

Not really I can see people who followed his teachings still stand by him.. lol.. not so ridiculous like you think.. sorry..

I sign off, knowing well that, none of the questions will be answered, and none of my arguments will be refuted cogently. If Nithyananda cannot answer the questions, Admin, doubly cannot.

Again don’t let your imaginations fly high.. lol..

21 admin March 17, 2010 at 5:26 am

@Naren

1) Section 420 – Cheating and indulging in fraudulent activities.

Ya media were cheating and indulging in fraudulent activities.. like placing a video in someone’s bedroom and telecasting it.. lol

2) Section 506 – Punishment for intimidation (of the inmates such as Lenin Karuppan).

Not proven!

3) Section 376 – Punishment for Rape (where several of the women devotees are said to be raped by Swami Nithyananda. A Canadian Women was said to have been raped by Nithyananda! She later died and the cause for the death could not be determined).

No Evidence and not proven again and he has not raped anyone in the video lol

4)Section 295 (A) – Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.

hehe.. that’s a funny section.. here is a guy who was trying to spread the religion and you see what he was doing in his private space where no one got the rights to do it and say he hurts me.. lol.. people should have felt hurt in that sense whenever they had sex with their beloved ones.. hehe..

5) Section 377 – Sexual activity “against the order of nature” which was earlier involving of Homosexuality and was repealed on 2/7/2009. This section of the law involves punishment and criminalisation of coercive sex and sex with minors. Nithyananda was alleged to have involved in coercive sex and hence the law was enforced on him. He also had indulged in unnatural sex offences apparently complained by Lenin Karuppan.

Lenin karuppan or who ever can say whatever he wants to, he has to prove what he claims is right.. lol..

6) Section 120 – Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment (Criminal Conspiracy)

hehe so you are saying he has to put a stage and have sex? also when was the last time having sex became commiting offence? (No video proved he had sex come on make sense.. don’t talk like a child we know what sex is right? kissing is not sex lol)

surely he will be arrested on most of these charges.So bye-bye Mr.nithyanandha.lmao

lmao I don’t think so.. don’t trust too much on media..

22 naren March 17, 2010 at 5:36 am

HAHA THERE GOES MR.NITHYANANDHA- 2 BEATING AROUND THE BUSH!I PITY THE ADMIN!HE IS SO BLIND…AND HE WANTS TO SEE THE WHOLE VIDEO OF THAT ASSHOLE HAVING SEX!NOW THATS INTRUSION OF PRIVACY BY YOU MISTER LMAO!WELL WELL HERE IS ONE GUY WHO WOULD STAND BY HIS POINT NO MATTER WHAT!AND HIS ANSWERS GET DUMBER DUMBER!SO
SAD PEOPLE ARE STILL ILLITERATE IN THEIR MINDS!DUMBASS FREAKS NEVER LEARN!END OF CONVO

23 admin March 17, 2010 at 5:38 am

@All

Thank you all for taking time to express your views on the issue.. unfortunately I am in the middle of my exams and I don’t have much time to respond to the claims. plus I am really bored to talk on the same subject.. I think I have said more than enough.. so bye bye guys for another month.. you can still subscribe the latest posts in this blog which will be updated by one of my staffs..

Thank You

24 naren March 17, 2010 at 5:41 am

wow for the first time i feel happy because of you!please go away!lol!anyways cheers man..u know u got great composure even after all the verbal attack from various people!good luck for whateverr exams u are writing!

25 admin March 17, 2010 at 5:50 am

@Naren

Thanks for the wishes man.. I hope I get the subjects in my mind.. not the video where Nithyananda having fun with that actress lol.. (Just kidding) you know I got to defend myself when it becomes a debate and yeah many people have cursed me to the core on this one and got mad on me.. even you I hope.. but its nice to see people coming forward. Sorry if I offended you. hope to see you around on other topics as well :)

@Naveen Nair & Gary

I personally thank both of you for spending your time to express your views.. highly appreciated. Hope to see you guys around and feel free to leave your comments on this blog :)

Wish you all success in whatever you are doing..

26 naren March 17, 2010 at 5:54 am

peace :) adios

27 Naveen Nair March 17, 2010 at 12:38 pm

@ Admin. As you have wound up your points, I would also like to do the same.

1: No answer to the point I raised first. Regarding snubbing my refuting your initial post.

2. You say: “I am supporting Nithyananda as an individual who got all the rights to do whatever in his personal space. I want people to prove what he has done is wrong with some sense.. which none did.” In the first place, a saint who shunned all the worldly pleasures, there by shun his personal space too. Thus there is no question of a ‘personal space’. Nithyananda, along with all his supporters, is too much worried about the private life, which is very suspicious. People, were consistently proving that what he has done is wrong. All the questions which I asked, and which as I expected, you couldn’t answer, is proof enough to conclude the viciousness of his acts.

3. You say: “video is still under investigation, also I don’t know where he had sex in the video. but my point is even if he did one who should be worried about it are the people who followed him and not others and secondly that’s his private space.” So far I haven’t come across any governement body doubting the genuineness of the video. The whole morphing theory is something raised by Nithyananda fans. Anyone who is initiated to the digital world can easily understand that the video is not a doctored one. And more, in your own post dated March 8th, you admit that, “its Nithyananda without any doubt on my part.”

4. You say: “Again video has not proved he had sex.. plus no rules whatever on a person who wears safron should not have sex..” The Nakkeeran video, with that funny background song, clearly shows Ranjitha jerking him off, and giving him a BJ. If that doesn’t fall under sex, I don’t know what it is. I also elaborated, with the name of the texts, why Shankaracharya felt one shouldn’t pursue worldly pleasures, while wearing saffron. You are just acting deaf to that. If Nithyananda wanted to explore sex and spirituality together, there were umpteen other methods. Tantric ways in which samadhi can be attained via sex, or Osho’s methods in which you need not repress sex. But to be popular, saffron is the easiest way. Nithyananda know that well.

5. You say: “I can see people who followed his teachings still stand by him.. lol.. not so ridiculous like you think”. Here I would tell you what you told me – that you are not updating yourself with latest news. All his ashrams are deserted, and you see the supporters only in those youtube videos sponsored by him and those guys who sadly are not man enough to admit the blunder. Abroad ashrams are closing down, the no of subscribers in his youtube videos are getting reduced day after day, the comments in all the Nithyananda websites/channels are blocked now.

6. The final message is this: You haven’t answered any of the questions which I raised, which many raised. Nithyananda did wrong. He was not supposed to have sex while on saffron. That is not just a popular morality, but something which is set by Shankara, the very same person Nithyananda calls out before all his stupid talks. Again, as I told you in my previous post, you are just beating around the bush, without answering any of these fundamental questions.

As you said, even I’m feeling bored now. All the best for your exams.

28 Alex March 17, 2010 at 1:10 pm

@Naveen Nair

Admin won’t be available till the end of April like mentioned before he got his exams on the way. But he wants to let you know that he agrees that he is beating around the bushes and he wants to personally thank you for the wishes.

I will be in charge of the blog for another month from now till he gets back. I feel we had enough discussion on the topic. So I will be closing the comments on this post tomorrow(As advised by admin). You are still free to post your views on other topics in the blog.

Thank you

29 Naveen Nair March 17, 2010 at 3:17 pm

Great. Convey my best wishes to Admin and wish all the very best in his exams on my behalf. Thanks.

30 Gary March 17, 2010 at 4:28 pm

good luck on your exams dude! ( btw you are still a weirdo :p) see you in a month

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: